Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

Popular Posts Today

The TV Watch: Tina Fey Signs Off ‘30 Rock,’ Broken Barriers Behind Her

Written By Unknown on Kamis, 31 Januari 2013 | 13.07

Tina Fey leaves prime time television pretty much the way she entered it seven years ago, as a sly observer who bites the network that feeds her so much material.

Ending its run on Thursday night, "30 Rock," the show Ms. Fey created, helped write and starred in, was a witty sendup of network television that cut uncannily close to the bone. It seemed at times almost like a transcript of production meetings at the NBC headquarters, at 30 Rockefeller Center. Ms. Fey made use and fun of everything that NBC holds sacred, including product placement, corporate synergy and some of its most venerable stars.

In a recent episode Ms. Fey's character, Liz Lemon, is thrilled to be included in a celebration of "80 under 80." Liz explains that the event honors "women in entertainment who aren't Betty White."

It's funny, but the remark is also Ms. Fey's way of deflecting attention from her own stature. For a new generation of female writer-performers who now have their own sitcoms, at least partly thanks to her, Ms. Fey is the new Betty White, a figure so accomplished, beloved and irreproachable that it's almost impossible not to joke about her.

On "The Mindy Project," on Fox, the doctor played by Mindy Kaling (like Ms. Fey, Ms. Kaling is the creator as well as the star of her show) riffles through an asthmatic male co-worker's shoulder bag for an inhaler. She finds among other things a copy of Ms. Fey's best-selling book, "Bossypants," and demands to know why he is reading it.

Gasping, he replies, "I wanted to see how Tina Fey could juggle it all."

The final episode of "30 Rock" is a one-hour special that sort of ties up loose ends but mostly gives its creator one last chance to don a disguise that was delightful and also the weakest part of the show.

Ms. Fey cast herself as a slovenly, aimless nerd who is a pushover at work and, for much of the series, single and hapless at home, the kind of person who was happy "eating night cheese and transitioning pajamas into day wear," as Liz Lemon says of herself. Ms. Fey is better at writing — and impersonating Sarah Palin — than she is at acting. She was never fully convincing in the role of a loser.

"30 Rock" was modeled on "The Mary Tyler Moore Show" in many important ways, except for its heroine. Liz was not a goody-goody perfectionist like Mary Richards, or, by her own admission, Ms. Fey herself. Disciplined, ambitious type-A's can be comical, as Ms. Moore, and later Candice Bergen, the star of "Murphy Brown," proved. But Ms. Fey, who was the first female head writer of "Saturday Night Live," chose as her alter ego a dumpy sad sack who just happened to be the head writer of a late-night sketch comedy show.

She created deliciously absurd characters like the silkily self-possessed network executive Jack Donaghy, played brilliantly by Alec Baldwin, and the insane comedian Tracy Jordan, played by Tracy Morgan, by grafting familiar show-business phenotypes onto those actors' inner nuttiness. Ms. Fey borrows shamelessly from real life, except when it comes to her own success. It may be that she plays against type because she is uncomfortable with the deadly earnest role of trailblazer. But she is one.

There have been plenty of female comedy writers before she came along — Diane English ("Murphy Brown") and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason ("Designing Women"), to name but two, as well as notable performers who created their own characters and carried their own comedy shows like Lucille Ball, Carol Burnett, Tracey Ullman and Roseanne Barr. But before Ms. Fey there were almost no women on network television who created and wrote their own shows and starred in them. One of the more notable exceptions dates to the days of black-and-white: Gertrude Berg created, wrote and starred in a hit radio comedy about a Jewish matriarch in the Bronx that was turned into a CBS sitcom, "The Goldbergs," in 1949.

When "30 Rock" had its premiere in 2006 Ms. Fey was that rare thing, a female writer starring in her own prime-time network show. She has moved on to movies, starring with Paul Rudd in a new comedy, "Admission," to be released in the spring.

She doesn't leave television in a vacuum. Now of course Ms. Kaling has her Fox show; Lena Dunham has "Girls" on HBO; and Whitney Cummings, who created and stars in "Whitney" on NBC, also is a co-creator of the CBS comedy "2 Broke Girls." Amy Poehler, who like Ms. Fey is a "Saturday Night Live" alumna, is one of the writers as well as the lead of "Parks and Recreation" on NBC.

Ratings were never the real measure of the reach of "30 Rock." Those only peaked in 2008, immediately after Ms. Fey's dead-ringer impersonation of Ms. Palin on "Saturday Night Live" stoked audience interest. Critical praise and a deluge of Emmy Awards, so many that Ms. Fey has joked about it, are a better gauge of the show's influence. So are the celebrity cameos.

It doesn't take much to coax politicians and television anchors to make comic cameos anymore — Brian Williams is practically a regular on "30 Rock," and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. let Ms. Poehler swoon over him on a recent episode of "Parks and Recreation." But "30 Rock" had an even greater appeal, drawing famous people who are not particularly known for self-mockery, including Condoleezza Rice (in her cameo the former secretary of state is furious that her ex-boyfriend Jack broke up with her by text), Oprah Winfrey and the House Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi. In the final episode Ms. Pelosi gives a mock-television interview denouncing Jack Donaghy as an "economic war criminal."

Ms. Fey is a pioneer who resists being taken too seriously. She prefers to be revered for her irreverence. But one sign of her influence is her ability to persuade powerful, sensible women to go on "30 Rock" and make fools of themselves.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

F.B.I. Raids Offices of Doctor Tied to Menendez

Peter W. Cross for The New York Times

Federal agents taking files from the offices of Dr. Salomon Melgen, a Florida eye surgeon.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation on Tuesday raided the offices of a prominent South Florida eye surgeon who is a wealthy Democratic Party donor with close ties to Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey.

Agents remained all day Wednesday at Vitreo-Retinal Consultants Eye Center, the West Palm Beach offices of the doctor, Salomon Melgen. They also searched several other offices that the doctor has in the area, according to a law enforcement official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation was continuing. Dr. Melgen, 58, owns over a dozen Florida-registered companies.

At the West Palm Beach office, agents from the F.B.I. were joined by the Office of the Inspector General of the federal Department of Health and Human Services, which investigates fraud in Medicare, Medicaid and other agency programs.

At midmorning, investigators carried in a crowbar, and a locksmith arrived shortly after noon. A few hours later, they hauled away more than 30 cardboard boxes and placed them into the back of an unmarked van and into a white vehicle.

Other than acknowledging that the F.B.I. was "conducting law enforcement activity" there, the agency declined to comment.

"The government has not informed Dr. Melgen what its concerns are," Lawrence Duffy, a lawyer for Dr. Melgen, said in a statement. "However, we are confident that Dr. Melgen has acted appropriately at all times."

Records show Dr. Melgen, who is best known for his association with Democratic politicians, including Senator Menendez, owes the Internal Revenue Service more than $10 million.

The raid came just four days after a conservative Web site alleged that the F.B.I. was looking into accusations that Mr. Menendez and Dr. Melgen frequented under-age prostitutes in the Dominican Republic.

The site included videos from alleged prostitutes and e-mail exchanges between an F.B.I. agent and a source in the Dominican Republic, who first referred the case to a nonprofit group in Washington.

In a statement, the senator called the allegations involving prostitutes "false" and "manufactured by a politically-motivated right-wing blog." The senator's office said Wednesday night that Mr. Menendez had reimbursed Dr. Melgen $58,500 for two flights that he had taken aboard his private jet in 2010.

The senator also called Dr. Melgen "a friend and political supporter."

Dr. Melgen told The New York Times last week, "I can assure you that all of the allegations are false."

Jacqui Goddard and William K. Rashbaum contributed reporting.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

The Lede Blog: Live Video of Newtown Residents Testifying Before State Task Force

"We need to somehow hold onto that feeling of oneness." Scarlet, mother of Jesse Lewis, child killed in Newtown. http://t.co/nQHBp4TC

— Newtown Patch (@NewtownPatch) 30 Jan 13

Hundreds of people, including families who lost children in the Dec. 14 mass shooting, packed Newtown High School in Connecticut on Wednesday night so they could tell members of a state legislative task force on gun violence and children's safety what changes in laws and policies they wanted to see.

Members of the General Assembly's 52-member bipartisan task force traveled to Newtown to hear from residents at the hearing. The task force, looking to make changes in areas ranging from gun control to mental health, held a similar hearing recently in Hartford.

As my colleague, Peter Applebome, reported, parents, public officials, law enforcement officers and school employees offered a full-throated call for stronger gun laws. The political wrangling between gun rights advocates and their foes was eclipsed, at least for one night, by collective grief.

The task force hearing in Newtown was held on the same day that the Senate Judiciary Committee in Washington held its first hearing on gun violence in the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting, which left 20 pupils and 6 staff members of the elementary school dead.

During the hearing in Washington, which the Lede covered earlier, former Representative Gabrielle Giffords called on lawmakers to be "bold and courageous" in creating solutions to reduce gun violence.

In Connecticut, the hearing also drew teachers with views on what steps should and should not be taken to quell violence.

Tom Swets, taught shooter Adam Lanza at NHS. He will quit tomorrow if teachers are told to carry guns. http://t.co/g73ULZeP

— Newtown Patch (@NewtownPatch) 31 Jan 13

Earlier this week, The Newtown Bee, the town's newspaper, reported that the first permanent memorial to the lives lost at Sandy Hook Elementary School had been dedicated.

First Permanent Memorial To Sandy Hook School Victims Is Dedicated http://t.co/yoGWPCK9 http://t.co/kGRSNUJH

— The Newtown Bee (@TheNewtownBee) 30 Jan 13


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Israeli Jets Attack Target Deep in Syria

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Calls for Stricter Gun Laws Dominate Newtown Hearing

Robert Stolarik for The New York Times

Scarlett Lewis, the mother of Jesse McCord Lewis, 6, a victim of the Sandy Hook school massacre Dec. 14, spoke Wednesday at Newtown High School before a Connecticut gun task force hearing.

NEWTOWN, Conn. — In riveting testimony repeatedly interrupted by standing ovations, parents, public officials, law enforcement officers and school employees issued a full-throated call on Wednesday night for strengthening the nation's gun laws in the wake of the massacre of 26 children and educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in December.

For one night at least, in the same high school auditorium where President Obama comforted the victims of Sandy Hook and issued his call for action on guns, the legislative muddle of competing lobbies and gun agendas was washed away by the grief of Sandy Hook and demands for measures to make sure something like it never happens again.

David Wheeler, who lost his son, Benjamin, on Dec. 14, told a state legislative panel studying gun violence, mental health and school safety that his first-grade son died because an unstable suicidal individual "had access to a weapon that has no place in a home."

At the end of his three-minute remarks, he told a panel that Thomas Jefferson said government was instituted to protect our unalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He said that those words and their order were no accident.

"The liberty of any person to own a military-style assault weapon and a high-capacity magazine and keep them in their home is second to the right of my son to his life," he said. "His life, to the right to live of all of those children and those teachers, the rights of your children, of you, of all of us. Let's honor the founding documents and get our priorities straight."

Testimony included repeated calls for improved mental health services and reflections on the responsibilities of parents. But the main focus was on the weapons used at Sandy Hook and in other mass slayings in the United States.

Brad Greene, who spoke surrounded by supporters of an antigun march scheduled for Feb. 14 in Hartford, said he and others had received a chilling education in the nation's gun laws.

"We have come away appalled at what our laws allow," he said. "We are incredulous at the type of assault and semiautomatic weapons and magazine clips that are considered legal. What is the logic behind allowing anyone with a wad of cash to buy an arsenal without a background check? It's beyond our comprehension."

Unlike the committee's first hearing on Monday in Hartford, at which gun rights supporters from across the state turned out in force, proponents of gun control in green ribbons and stickers reading "We Demand Change Now" were by far the most conspicuous presence — both in testimony and in the audience, which filled the Newtown High School auditorium. And local officials and residents, still scarred by the tragedy, demanded it lead to change, no matter how hard the legislative obstacles.

Susie Ehrens, whose daughter, Emma, escaped from the school, appealed to the legislators to act as if it were their own children who did not come home alive that day.

"We are Americans," she said. "We stop being the world's greatest country when we allow our most vulnerable citizens to be slaughtered because we might offend people by taking away their guns. We stop being something to be proud of when we love our guns more than we love our children."

Jim Gaston, a member of the Newtown Board of Selectmen, said he was a gun owner, owned rifles and enjoyed shooting.

"As a gun owner and someone who enjoys the sport," he said, "I can assure you there is absolutely no reason that civilians need to have or should have access to high-powered assault weapons or mega-magazines."

After the families, officials and school personnel testified, other members of the public spoke against new gun rules as well as for them.

David Barzetti said his 5-year-old son played with Jesse Lewis, one of the children who was killed. He said he understood the anguish over gun issues but did not believe more laws were needed.

"We are divided into two groups, one that thinks if we keep people from owning guns it can stop another 12/14 from happening," he said, referring to the date of the shooting. "The other group wants to protect ourselves from others like Adam Lanza."

He said gun control laws did not reduce crime and that gun owners should have choices of what weapons to own. "Obviously we don't need an assault rifle to kill a deer, but we also don't need to take away a 500-horsepower vehicle from an owner who wants to own a high-powered vehicle. That's their choice."

There were some vivid windows into the horror Dec. 14. Mary Ann Jacob, a school staff member, recalled the way it began as a routine Friday morning, how Victoria Soto, one of the teachers, grumbled that it was a bad day because she had spilled her coffee. Then came strange sounds that Ms. Jacob could not decipher until it became clear that hundreds of bullets were rocketing through the school.

"Make no mistake," she said. "If there was a police officer in our building that day, he would be dead. Adam Lanza did not knock on the door and ask for permission to come in. He shot his way through the door barely seconds after he got out of his car."

She added, "Nobody needs a gun that can kill 26 people and shoot hundreds of rounds of ammunition in three minutes."

Kristin Hussey contributed reporting.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Officials Back Deep Cuts in Atlantic Cod Harvest to Save Industry

Katherine Taylor for The New York Times

The Lady Jane, a fishing boat, in Gloucester, Mass. The New England Fishery Management Council voted to impose reductions of 77 percent in the Gulf of Maine cod catch.

PORTSMOUTH, N.H. — Fishery management officials meeting here on Wednesday voted to impose drastic new cuts to the commercial harvest of cod along the Atlantic coast, arguing that the only way to save the centuries-old cod fishing industry was to sharply limit it.

In the 1600s, the lowly cod was so abundant in the cold North Atlantic waters that, along with boatbuilding and timbering, it provided the foundation of the New England economy. In the 1700s, a "sacred cod" was bestowed on the State House in Massachusetts, where it hangs to this day as a symbol of the importance of cod fishing to the region.

But over recent decades, the once bountiful cod has been so depleted that government officials now say that it stands on the verge of extinction.

At a grim daylong session here, a deeply divided New England Fishery Management Council voted to recommend reductions of 77 percent from last year's catch for each of the next three years for cod in the Gulf of Maine.

It also recommended cuts of 61 percent from last year for one year only to the cod catch on Georges Bank, a vast area off Cape Cod, which was named for the fish. The council's recommendations are subject to approval by the federal government, which is expected to put them in place by May 1.

"We are headed, slowly, seeming inexorably, to oblivion," said John Bullard, the regional administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and a member of the council, as he explained his support for the catch limits. "I do not deny the costs that are going to be paid by fishermen, families, communities. They are real. They will hurt."

The problem, he said, is not government inflexibility, as fishermen have suggested, but the lack of fish. "It's midnight and getting darker when it comes to how many cod there are," he said. "There isn't enough cod for people to make a decent living."

But opponents said the limits would not help save the industry.

"Right now what we've got is a plan that guarantees the fishermen's extinction and does nothing to ameliorate it," David Goethel, a New Hampshire-based fisherman and biologist, said as he cast his vote against the plan.

Fishermen were furious with the result.

"I'm leaving here in a coffin," said Carlos Rafael, who owns a commercial fishing business in New Bedford, Mass. "With all these cuts, I won't be able to keep half of my fleet working. I'll have to cut down from 20 groundfish boats to maybe 5or 6."

Before the vote, fishermen had crowded into the meeting room, many pleading that the limits not be set so low.

"We have done everything that has been asked of us," said Paul Vitale, who fishes commercially in Gloucester, Mass. "I don't want to go anywhere else for work, as demented as that sounds."

The plan reduces the catch of cod in the Gulf of Maine down to 1,550 metric tons a year for the next three years; the limit was 8,000 metric tons a decade ago. The catch in Georges Bank would drop to 2,002 metric tons, down from 12,000 from a decade ago.

 "They're huge, there's no other way to describe it," said Tom Nies, a fishery analyst for the council.

At its last peak in 2001, Mr. Nies said, the industry made about $100 million. It made about $80 million last year. The new limits could cut the size of the industry for this year to about $55 million, for a loss of $25 million.

 But fishermen said the true impact of the cuts would go much deeper.

 "It's 80 percent of a really small number to begin with," Mr. Goethe said. He said the actual loss to the industry would be more like $60 million. "When you get down to cuts that small, there's simply no place to go," he said.

Frank Mirarchi, a fisherman from Scituate, Mass., who primarily pursues groundfish, said that the proposed limits would deprive him of his living and that the cuts would ripple up and down the coast.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 30, 2013

An earlier version of a home page picture caption misstated the location of the fisherman Andrew McConiskey. He is shown in Massachusetts, not Maine.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Chinese Hackers Infiltrate New York Times Computers

SAN FRANCISCO — For the last four months, Chinese hackers have persistently attacked The New York Times, infiltrating its computer systems and getting passwords for its reporters and other employees.

The New York Times published an article in October about the wealth of the family of China's prime minister, Wen Jiabao, in both English and Chinese.

After surreptitiously tracking the intruders to study their movements and help erect better defenses to block them, The Times and computer security experts have expelled the attackers and kept them from breaking back in.

The timing of the attacks coincided with the reporting for a Times investigation, published online on Oct. 25, that found that the relatives of Wen Jiabao, China's prime minister, had accumulated a fortune worth several billion dollars through business dealings.

Security experts hired by The Times to detect and block the computer attacks gathered digital evidence that Chinese hackers, using methods that some consultants have associated with the Chinese military in the past, breached The Times's network. They broke into the e-mail accounts of its Shanghai bureau chief, David Barboza, who wrote the reports on Mr. Wen's relatives, and Jim Yardley, The Times's South Asia bureau chief in India, who previously worked as bureau chief in Beijing.

"Computer security experts found no evidence that sensitive e-mails or files from the reporting of our articles about the Wen family were accessed, downloaded or copied," said Jill Abramson, executive editor of The Times.

The hackers tried to cloak the source of the attacks on The Times by first penetrating computers at United States universities and routing the attacks through them, said computer security experts at Mandiant, the company hired by The Times. This matches the subterfuge used in many other attacks that Mandiant has tracked to China.

The attackers first installed malware — malicious software — that enabled them to gain entry to any computer on The Times's network. The malware was identified by computer security experts as a specific strain associated with computer attacks originating in China. More evidence of the source, experts said, is that the attacks started from the same university computers used by the Chinese military to attack United States military contractors in the past.

Security experts found evidence that the hackers stole the corporate passwords for every Times employee and used those to gain access to the personal computers of 53 employees, most of them outside The Times's newsroom. Experts found no evidence that the intruders used the passwords to seek information that was not related to the reporting on the Wen family.

No customer data was stolen from The Times, security experts said.

Asked about evidence that indicated the hacking originated in China, and possibly with the military, China's Ministry of National Defense said, "Chinese laws prohibit any action including hacking that damages Internet security." It added that "to accuse the Chinese military of launching cyberattacks without solid proof is unprofessional and baseless."

The attacks appear to be part of a broader computer espionage campaign against American news media companies that have reported on Chinese leaders and corporations.

Last year, Bloomberg News was targeted by Chinese hackers, and some employees' computers were infected, according to a person with knowledge of the company's internal investigation, after Bloomberg published an article on June 29 about the wealth accumulated by relatives of Xi Jinping, China's vice president at the time. Mr. Xi became general secretary of the Communist Party in November and is expected to become president in March. Ty Trippet, a spokesman for Bloomberg, confirmed that hackers had made attempts but said that "no computer systems or computers were compromised."

Signs of a Campaign

The mounting number of attacks that have been traced back to China suggest that hackers there are behind a far-reaching spying campaign aimed at an expanding set of targets including corporations, government agencies, activist groups and media organizations inside the United States. The intelligence-gathering campaign, foreign policy experts and computer security researchers say, is as much about trying to control China's public image, domestically and abroad, as it is about stealing trade secrets.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 31, 2013

An earlier version of this article misstated the year that the United States and Israel were said to have started a cyber attack that caused damage at Iran's main nuclear enrichment plant, and the article misstated the specific type of attack. The attack was a computer worm, not a virus, and it started around 2008, not 2012.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

To Open Eyes, W-2s List Cost of Health Plans

Written By Unknown on Rabu, 30 Januari 2013 | 13.07

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Thaksin Shinawatra of Thailand Wields Influence From Afar

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Obama Urges Speed on Immigration Plan, but Exposes Conflicts

Jason Reed/Reuters

President Obama, in Las Vegas, said he would propose his own immigration bill if Congress did not move "in a timely fashion."

LAS VEGAS — Seizing an opening to rewrite the nation's immigration laws, President Obama challenged Congress on Tuesday to act swiftly to put 11 million illegal immigrants living in the United States on a clear path to citizenship.

But his push for speedy action and his silence on proposals to defer the opportunity for legal residency until the country's borders are deemed secure provoked criticism from a Republican leader on the issue. The response suggests that reaching consensus on immigration law changes remained difficult despite a new bipartisan push since the November elections.

Speaking at a high school here in a state that has seen rapid growth in its Hispanic population, the president praised a bipartisan group of senators who proposed their own sweeping immigration overhaul a day earlier, saying their plan was very much in line with his own proposals.

Mr. Obama warned, however, that "the closer we get, the more emotional this debate is going to become." He said that if Congress did not move forward "in a timely fashion" on its own legislation, he would send up a specific measure — something the White House has put off for now — and demand a vote.

The president's speech immediately exposed potential fault lines in the coming debate. He said, for example, that there must be a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants "from the outset," a statement that would seem at odds with the assertion by some senators that citizenship must be tied to tighter border security.

Senator Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican seen as an influential party voice on an issue that cost Republicans in last year's voting, said he was "concerned by the president's unwillingness to accept significant enforcement triggers before current undocumented immigrants can apply for a green card."

"Without such triggers in place," he went on, "enforcement systems will never be implemented, and we will be back in just a few years dealing with millions of new undocumented people in our country."

Although Mr. Obama did not say it in his speech, the White House is also proposing that the United States treat same-sex couples the same as other families, meaning that people would be able to use their relationship as a basis to obtain a visa — another element likely to be resisted by some conservative Republicans.

Brendan Buck, a spokesman for Speaker John A. Boehner, said in a statement that House Republicans "hope the president is careful not to drag the debate to the left and ultimately disrupt the difficult work that is ahead in the House and Senate."

A senior administration official said the speech was the start of a concerted campaign to force Republicans to follow through on the bipartisan proposal. He predicted that given the president's popularity with Hispanic voters, they would find it hard vote down a bill with his name on it.

Mr. Obama offered a familiar list of proposals: tightening security on borders, cracking down on employers who hire illegal immigrants and temporarily issuing more visas to clear the huge backlog of people applying for legal status in the country.

His speech, on the heels of the bipartisan Senate proposal, sets the terms for one of the year's landmark legislative debates. These are only the opening steps in a complicated dance, and both the politics and the policy can be treacherous ground, as shown by the failed effort to overhaul immigration laws in the George W. Bush administration.

But the flurry of activity underscores the powerful new momentum behind an overhaul of the system, after an election that dramatized the vulnerability of Republicans on the issue, with Mr. Obama piling up lopsided majorities over Mitt Romney among Hispanic voters.

"Most Americans agree that it's time to fix a system that's been broken for way too long," Mr. Obama said to an audience of about 2,000 high school students, many of them Hispanic. They applauded loudly when he mentioned the Dream Act, which offers amnesty to children of immigrants who are in the United States illegally.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Egyptian Army Chief Warns of Collapse Amid Chaos

Tara Todras-Whitehill for The New York Times

A protester threw a tear gas canister in clashes with the police in Cairo. Several Egyptian cities were in open rebellion on Tuesday.

CAIRO — As three Egyptian cities defied President Mohamed Morsi's attempt to quell the anarchy spreading through their streets, the nation's top general warned Tuesday that the state itself was in danger of collapse if the feuding civilian leaders could not agree on a solution to restore order.

Thousands of residents poured into the streets of the three cities, protesting a 9 p.m. curfew with another night of chants against Mr. Morsi and assaults on the police.

The president appeared powerless to stop them: he had already granted the police extralegal powers to enforce the curfew and then called out the army as well. His allies in the Muslim Brotherhood and their opposition also proved ineffectual in the face of the crisis, each retreating to their corners, pointing fingers of blame.

The general's warning punctuated a rash of violent protests across the country that has dramatized the near-collapse of the government's authority. With the city of Port Said proclaiming its nominal independence, protesters demanded the resignation of Mr. Morsi, Egypt's first freely elected president, while people across the country appeared convinced that taking to the streets in protests was the only means to get redress for their grievances.

Just five months after Egypt's president assumed power from the military, the cascading crisis revealed the depth of the distrust for the central government left by decades of autocracy, two years of convoluted transition and his own acknowledged missteps in facing the opposition. With cities in open rebellion and the police unable to tame crowds, the very fabric of society appears to be coming undone.

The chaos has also for the first time touched pillars of the long-term health of Egypt's economy, already teetering after two years of turbulence since the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak. While a heavy deployment of military troops along the Suez Canal — a vital source of revenue — appeared to insulate it from the strife in Port Said, Suez and Ismailia, the clashes near Tahrir Square in Cairo spilled over for the first time into an armed assault on the historic Semiramis InterContinental Hotel, sending tremors of fear through the vital tourism sector.

With the stakes rising and no solution in sight, Gen. Abdul Fattah el-Sisi, the defense minister, warned Egypt's new Islamist leaders and their opponents that "their disagreement on running the affairs of the country may lead to the collapse of the state and threatens the future of the coming generations."

"Political, economic, social and security challenges" require united action "by all parties" to avoid "dire consequences that affect the steadiness and stability of the homeland," General Sisi said in an address to military cadets that was later relayed as a public statement from his spokesman. And the acute polarization of the civilian politics, he suggested, has now becoming a concern of the military because "to affect the stability of the state institutions is a dangerous matter that harms Egyptian national security."

Coming just months after the military relinquished the power it seized at the ouster of Mr. Mubarak, General Sisi's rebuke to the civilian leaders inevitably raised the possibility that the generals might once again step into civilian politics. There was no indication of an imminent coup.

Analysts familiar with General Sisi's thinking say that unlike his predecessors, he wants to avoid any political entanglements. But the Egyptian military has prided itself on its dual military and political role since Col. Gamal Abdel Nasser's coup more than six decades ago. And General Sisi insisted Tuesday that it would remain "the solid mass and the backbone upon which rest the Egyptian state's pillars."

With the army now caught between the president's instructions to restore order and the citizens' refusal to comply, he said, the "armed forces are facing a serious dilemma" as they seek to end the violence without "confronting citizens and their right to protest."

The attack on the Semiramis Hotel, between the American Embassy and the Nile in one of the most heavily guarded neighborhoods of the city, showed how much security had deteriorated. And it testified to the difficult task that the civilian government faces in trying to rebuild public security and trust.

Kareem Fahim and Mayy El Sheikh contributed reporting from Cairo.

Kareem Fahim and Mayy El Sheikh contributed reporting from Cairo.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Report Links Rodriguez and Others to Clinic and P.E.D.’s

Investigators for Major League Baseball created an improvised war room in the commissioner's Park Avenue offices in Manhattan in recent months, mapping out potential evidence that would tie an anti-aging clinic in Coral Gables, Fla., to the possible use of performance-enhancing drugs by some of baseball's more prominent players. 

But because the investigators cannot compel witnesses to talk, they could do nothing more than scrutinize the clinic. As a result, they found themselves mere spectators Tuesday as a weekly Miami newspaper reported that it had obtained medical records from the clinic that tied a half-dozen players — Alex Rodriguez, Melky Cabrera, Gio Gonzalez, Bartolo Colon, Nelson Cruz and Yasmani Grandal — to the use of banned substances like human growth hormone.

The newspaper, Miami New Times, said it had received the records from an unnamed former employee of the clinic, which is now closed, and that they included handwritten notations listing various drugs that were allegedly distributed to various players. At least some of those documents were displayed online by the newspaper. However, the documents have not been independently authenticated, and Rodriguez, the Yankees slugger, and Gonzalez, a standout pitcher for the Washington Nationals, both issued statements denying they had been patients at the clinic.

Anthony Bosch, the operator of the clinic, known as Biogenesis of America, also issued a statement of denial through his lawyer, saying the Miami New Times article was "filled with inaccuracies, innuendos and misstatements in fact."

"Mr. Bosch vehemently denies the assertions that MLB players such as Alex Rodriguez and Gio Gonzalez were treated or associated with him," the statement added.

Despite the denials, Major League Baseball, long suspicious of the clinic's actions, will proceed in the belief that the assertions in the article have merit. Two of the players cited — Gonzalez and Cruz, an outfielder for the Texas Rangers — have not previously been linked to performance enhancers. Three others — Colon, who pitches for the Oakland A's; Cabrera, an outfielder with the Toronto Blue Jays; and Grandal, a catcher with the San Diego Padres — were suspended last year for positive drug tests.

And then there is Rodriguez, who admitted in 2009 that he used performance enhancers from 2001 to 2003, when he was with the Rangers, but who has denied in several meetings with baseball's investigators that he has done so since. Baseball officials have remained uneasy about those denials, and the Miami New Times article gives them something new to work with. But it is unclear what they can do about Rodriguez or anyone else cited in the article.

For one thing, the documents described in the article will not necessarily become available to Major League Baseball. Nor do they involve failed drug tests, which is the easiest evidence for baseball to act on. As a result, baseball may again find itself stuck, seeking perhaps to punish players without having the necessary means to do so.

In the case of the Biogenesis clinic, baseball's investigators traveled to Florida to meet with members of the federal Drug Enforcement Administration, who were taking a close look of their own at the facility. But it is uncertain if federal authorities would share with baseball any evidence they develop on the clinic. That has not happened in other instances over the last decade.

"If the feds are not going to prosecute this case, it would be much better for us for them to give us some usable evidence like the documents, so we can do our job and suspend the players," a baseball official said. "We could be in discipline hell if that doesn't happen."

But even if it obtained the documents, and they were authenticated, Major League Baseball would still be dealing with the fact that it has had little success in suspending players when they have not tested positive. Of the roughly 40 players who have been suspended for violating the testing program since 2005, only a handful have been punished based on evidence developed by baseball's investigators or from medical records or court documents.

The most high-profile instance of a suspension without a drug test occurred in 2006, when reliever Jason Grimsley was barred for 50 games after the federal authorities unsealed court documents that showed he had admitted to a federal agent that he had used human growth hormone.

The Florida clinic has been on the radar of both baseball and the federal government since at least 2009, when investigators uncovered evidence that the slugger Manny Ramirez had received a banned drug from the facility. Ramirez was ultimately suspended 50 games for that infraction.

Steve Eder and Alain Delaquérière contributed reporting from New York, and Lizette Alvarez from Miami.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Prior Problems In 787 Battery Set Off Concerns Boeing Was Aware of 787 Battery Problems Before Failure

Toru Hanai/Reuters

All Nippon Airways, the biggest operator of 787s, is holding jets at Haneda airport in Tokyo.

Even before two battery failures led to the grounding of all Boeing 787 jets this month, the lithium-ion batteries used on the aircraft had experienced multiple problems that raised questions about their reliability.

Officials at All Nippon Airways, the jets' biggest operator, said in an interview on Tuesday that it replaced 10 of the batteries in the months before fire in one plane and smoke in another led regulators around the world to ground the jets.

The airline said it told Boeing of the replacements as they occurred but was not required to report them to safety regulators because they were not considered a safety issue and no flights were canceled or delayed.

National Transportation Safety Board officials said Tuesday that their inquiry would include the replacements.

The airline also, for the first time, explained the extent of the previous problems, which underscore the volatile nature of the batteries and add to concerns over whether Boeing and other plane manufacturers will be able to use the batteries safely.

In five of the 10 replacements, All Nippon said that the main battery had showed an unexpectedly low charge. An unexpected drop in a 787's main battery also occurred on the All Nippon flight that had to make an emergency landing in Japan on Jan. 16.

The airline also revealed that in three instances, the main battery failed to operate normally and had to be replaced along with the charger. In other cases, one battery showed an error reading and another, used to start the auxiliary power unit, failed. All the events occurred from May to December of last year. The main battery on the plane that made the emergency landing was returned to its maker, GS Yuasa, and that 10 other batteries involved in mishaps were sent to the airline's maintenance department.

Kelly Nantel, a spokeswoman for the National Transportation Safety Board, said investigators had only recently heard that there had been "numerous issues with the use of these batteries" on 787s. She said the board had asked Boeing, All Nippon and other airlines for information about the problems.

"That will absolutely be part of the investigation," she said.

Boeing, based in Chicago, has said repeatedly that any problems with the batteries can be contained without threatening the planes and their passengers.

But in response to All Nippon's disclosures, Boeing officials said the airline's replacement of the batteries also suggested that safeguards were activated to prevent overheating and keep the drained batteries from being recharged.

Boeing officials also acknowledged that the new batteries were not lasting as long as intended. But All Nippon said that the batteries it replaced had not expired.

A GS Yuasa official, Tsutomu Nishijima, said battery exchanges were part of the normal operations of a plane but would not comment further.

The Federal Aviation Administration decided in 2007 to allow Boeing to use the lithium-ion batteries instead of older, more stable types as long as it took safety measures to prevent or contain a fire. But once Boeing put in those safeguards, it did not revisit its basic design even as more evidence surfaced of the risks involved, regulators said.

In a little-noticed test in 2010, the F.A.A. found that the kind of lithium-ion chemistry that Boeing planned to use — lithium cobalt — was the most flammable of several possible types. The test found that batteries of that type provided the most power, but could also overheat more quickly.

In 2011, a lithium-ion battery on a Cessna business jet started smoking while it was being charged, prompting Cessna to switch to traditional nickel-cadmium batteries.

The safety board said Tuesday that it had still not determined what caused a fire on Jan. 7 on a Japan Airlines 787 that was parked at Logan Airport in Boston. The fire occurred nine days before an All Nippon jet made its emergency landing after pilots smelled smoke in the cockpit.

Federal regulators said it was also possible that flaws in the manufacturing process could have gone undetected and caused the recent incidents.

The batteries' maker X-rays each battery before shipping to look for possible defects.

Matthew L. Wald contributed reporting.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Super Bowl: At Media Day, Spotlight on Head Injuries Grows

Chang W. Lee/The New York Times

Coach Jim Harbaugh arranged his 49ers for a Super Bowl photo at the Super Dome.

NEW ORLEANS — It has become a staple of Super Bowl week, as much a part of the pregame to the N.F.L.'s biggest event as the annual media day: a discussion of how football is being affected by head injuries and the mounting evidence that long-term brain damage can be linked to injuries sustained on the field.

Years ago, players rarely spoke about the issue and league officials dismissed suggestions that on-field injuries could lead to life-altering health problems. Now, however, the league is facing lawsuits from thousands of former players, rules are being instituted in an attempt to diminish injuries on the field and even President Obama has said that the way football is played will have to change. This week, Bernard Pollard, a hard-hitting safety for the Baltimore Ravens, created a stir by saying that the N.F.L. would not exist in 30 years because of the rules changes designed with safety in mind, but that he also believed there would be a death on the field at some point.

At media day Tuesday, players reacted to the comments made by Pollard and Obama, with some agreeing with Pollard that recent rules changes would change the sport to such an extent that it would be less entertaining and lead to a loss of popularity. Pollard stood by his comments. He added, however, that while he was comfortable with the physical risk he was taking by playing football, he was not sure he would want future generations, including his 4-year-old son, to follow his example.

"My whole stance right now is that I don't want him to play football," Pollard said. "Football has been good to me. It has been my outlet. God has blessed me with a tremendous talent to be able to play this game. But we want our kids to have things better than us."

He said he did not want his son to go through the aches and pains caused by the physicality of the game.

"You keep playing football, you're going to have your injuries, no one is exempt from that," he said. "You're going to have concussions. You're going to have broken bones. That's going to happen. But I think for the most part, we know what we signed up for."

The sentiment was echoed by Baltimore quarterback Joe Flacco. "I play the game and I understand that I'm going to get hit," Flacco said. "Just because they fine the guys is not going to stop them from hitting me. I find it tough to fine people who are doing their job."

In a recent interview with The New Republic, Obama expressed concern about on-field injuries, though he added that N.F.L. players were grown men who are "well-compensated for the violence they do to their bodies."

The president added: "I think that those of us who love the sport are going to have to wrestle with the fact that it will probably change gradually to try to reduce some of the violence. In some cases, that may make it a little bit less exciting, but it will be a whole lot better for the players, and those of us who are fans maybe won't have to examine our consciences quite as much."

While many current players seem focused on rules changes and how they will affect the nature of the game, more than 4,000 former N.F.L. players have filed a lawsuit against the league, contending that it knew hits to the head could lead to long-term brain damage but did not share that information with players. The judge in the case said Tuesday that she would hear oral arguments April 9 regarding the league's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The family of Junior Seau, a former star linebacker who shot and killed himself last year, has also sued the N.F.L., claiming it failed to inform players about the risks of brain injury.

Pollard's counterparts on the San Francisco 49ers, safeties Dashon Goldson and Donte Whitner, considered one of the hardest-hitting tandems in the N.F.L., thought the key was not removing big hits, but making sure the hits that are delivered are legal.

"You can be vicious and you can hit people hard, but do it the right way," Whitner said. "For the most part, you know what you can and cannot do. Do you want to go out there and do the right things or do you want to make that big hit to gain a big name? That's what it comes down to."

Ravens guard Marshal Yanda said he thought the topic was so personal for Pollard because of the unique nature of being a hard-hitting defensive back, one of the positions most affected by the league's attempts to increase player safety.

"I think Bernard is frustrated because he plays a tough position where it's a bang-bang play and he's getting fined," Yanda said. "That's a tough deal as far as him playing football his whole life knowing how to play one way and then all of a sudden you have to change."

One of the few people to disagree entirely with Pollard's view that skewing the rules to protect offensive players would harm the league was Warren Sapp, a retired defensive tackle who at one point went by the Twitter handle @QBKilla. He said a desire for points would always result in defenses being limited.

"They like points," Sapp said. "I like it too. You're going to have to make some key stops here and there but it's an offensive game, no doubt about it."


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Super Bowl — Jerome Boger’s Probable Pick as Referee Is Questioned

Written By Unknown on Selasa, 29 Januari 2013 | 13.07

NEW ORLEANS — In many ways, it is fitting. Four months after the N.F.L. began its season with replacement officials — who struggled to complete a coin toss, confused which city a team hailed from and incorrectly identified whether the offense or defense had caught a critical pass in the end zone — another referee controversy is looming as the Super Bowl approaches.

That is because, while the San Francisco 49ers and the Baltimore Ravens clearly earned their way to the Super Bowl, questions have been raised about whether the top referee this season will be joining them.

The league is expected to announce this week that Jerome Boger, an N.F.L. referee for seven years, will lead the crew of officials here Sunday. Historically, that means Boger scored the highest among referees during the standard postgame evaluations — a notion that some observers and, privately, several other on-field officials find hard to comprehend.

"What's happening right now is that the best officials are not working the best games," said Jim Daopoulos, who worked 11 years as an on-field official and 12 years as a supervisor of officials before becoming an officiating analyst for NBC. Daopoulos added that he believed that the grading of some officials, including Boger, was altered because the league had a predetermined assignment in mind.

"I'm looking at the seven guys who are working in the Super Bowl, and to be quite honest, several of them should not be on the field," Daopoulos said.

Michael Signora, a spokesman for the N.F.L., disputed that, writing in an e-mail, "There is no merit to the suggestion that Jerome Boger's grades were treated differently from those of any other official."

Signora added, "Claims to the contrary are both inaccurate and unfair."

Still, some elements of the appointment seem strange. Ben Austro, the founder of FootballZebras.com, a Web site that focuses on news and analysis of officials in the N.F.L., first reported the Boger assignment several weeks ago. Austro said in an interview Monday that he was immediately struck by something unusual about the choice, noting that every official is graded by league observers following each game worked, with every call made being deemed correct or incorrect.

This season, according to Austro, there were approximately eight instances in which Boger was initially given what officials call a ding, or markdown, for a particular call, only to have those negative grades later overturned. In other words, Austro said, if Boger earned the best grades among referees this season, he did so with the help of significant after-the-fact revisions from those doing the grading.

Although it is not clear which grades were changed, Boger did have some unusual moments this season, most notably a sequence in Week 16 when he announced a penalty against Carolina quarterback Cam Newton for "bumping" him while protesting the officiating but did not eject Newton, as the rules require. Boger later said that he misspoke and that the penalty against Newton was only for "disrespectfully addressing" an official.

According to Daopoulos, the standard procedure is for one of several league supervisors to first review a game on his own. The supervisors then get together as a group to go over the downgrades detected, and generally, Daopoulos said, "the majority or consensus rules" when it comes to overturning a downgrade.

This season, however, Daopoulos — and several officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly — said Carl Johnson, the league's vice president for officiating, unilaterally overturned a number of Boger's downgrades.

Neither Johnson nor Ray Anderson, the league's executive vice president for football operations, were made available for comment. But Signora, the spokesman, said, "No downgrade is removed unless there is a consensus among the supervisors and the head of the department."

Regardless, while appealing a grade is not unusual — 14 of 18 referees did so successfully this season, according to Signora — the fact that Boger had eight reversals is odd, according to Gerry Austin, who officiated in three Super Bowls from 1982 to 2008 and is now an ESPN contributor.

"Based on my past experience, if you could get two downgrades changed in the course of the year, you've done real well," Austin said.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Protests Grow on Fifth Day of Unrest in Egypt

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Media Decoder Blog: After Staff Reductions, New Appointments at The Times

9:06 p.m. | Updated The New York Times announced on Monday a restructured masthead and some significant newsroom appointments, while also saying that the staff reductions the company was seeking had been accomplished primarily through voluntary buyouts.

In a memo to the staff, Jill Abramson, the executive editor, outlined many of the coming changes at the paper, saying she hoped they would help The Times continue "to meet the challenges of remaking ourselves for the digital age."

Ms. Abramson acknowledged in her memo that this round of staff reductions seemed different from previous ones, because it resulted in the loss of some of the most prominent editors at the paper. Among those choosing to take buyout packages were John M. Geddes, a managing editor; Jim Roberts, an assistant managing editor; and Jonathan Landman, the head of the culture department.

William E. Schmidt, the deputy managing editor, is also leaving.

Ms. Abramson also presented plans for a transformed masthead. Larry Ingrassia, the former business editor, will become an assistant managing editor for new initiatives, which includes the expansion of The Times's international coverage. Janet Elder will become an assistant managing editor with responsibility for overseeing newsroom resources, including the budget, as well as for dealing with compensation and staff development. Ian Fisher will become an assistant managing editor for content operations, with responsibility for overseeing the continued integration of the digital and print sides of The Times.

Jason Stallman, a deputy sports editor, will be the new sports editor, succeeding Joe Sexton, who announced last week he was moving to ProPublica. Ms. Abramson said she would announce the new culture editor in the next two weeks.

Rick Berke, currently an assistant managing editor, will now focus on video, an area the company has been trying to expand. Glenn Kramon, another assistant managing editor, will join the business department to oversee technology coverage.

"The changes under way are part of the journey that we've been on for years," Ms. Abramson wrote in her memo. "Integrating our print and digital operations, expanding our reporting, deepening our ways of telling stories, innovating in ways that make our journalism the literal envy of our profession and the joy of our readers."

In early December, Ms. Abramson said the newsroom needed to contribute to the company's cost-cutting efforts, and announced she was seeking 30 managers who were not union members to accept buyout packages. The company also allowed employees represented by the Newspaper Guild to volunteer for buyout packages. Employees had until Thursday to decide.

Ms. Abramson had said that if the paper did not get the required number of volunteers the company would have to resort to layoffs. But her note to the staff on Monday indicated that layoffs were kept to a minimum.

Here is Ms. Abramson's memo to the staff:

Colleagues,

I wanted to let you know quickly that we are through the process of offering voluntary buyouts and cutting staff. In the end, we had to lay off far fewer people than we anticipated, having achieved most of our savings through the voluntary process.

We will continue to reposition ourselves, to meet the challenges of remaking ourselves for the digital age. The changes under way are part of the journey that we've been on for years: integrating our print and digital operations, expanding our reporting, deepening our ways of telling stories, innovating in ways that make our journalism the literal envy of our profession and the joy of our readers.

This means that some colleagues are changing roles. Rick Berke will now focus on video as it becomes an even bigger part of our news report. Glenn Kramon will steer our technology coverage when it is at the heart of how the world turns. These are urgent assignments requiring leaders who know the full panoply of what the newsroom is capable of doing.

We will be naming a new culture editor in the next two weeks. Jason Stallman will be our new sports editor.

Our operational needs will continue to be handled by those on the masthead, which will now include some new names. Larry Ingrassia will be the assistant managing editor for new initiatives. In this role he will spearhead our many new ventures and revenue projects. There are several already in the works, including our expansion of international coverage.

Janet Elder will be assistant managing editor for newsroom administration. She will oversee newsroom resources, including managing our budget and dealing with compensation, staffing, career development and training.

Ian Fisher will be assistant managing editor for content operations. He will manage the deepening integration of our digital and print news reports, working closely with interactive news, engagement, mobile and technology.

In the coming days and weeks we will have time to pause and express our affection and boundless gratitude for our departing colleagues. Some of the longest-serving leaders in the newsroom are leaving, people who have given The Times so much of themselves and are responsible for so much of our excellence. Among them is John Geddes, whose smarts, ability to seamlessly get us through all manner of crises from hurricanes to blackouts and of course his ability to make us laugh at ourselves, will be sorely missed. Jon Landman is leaving too. He epitomizes the integrity and ingenuity of this place. Bill Schmidt, whose charm and grace symbolize the fundamental humanity of our newsroom, is planning to leave as well.

The very tread of Jim Roberts's cowboy boots means: "We have this covered." He will be moving on, as will Joe Sexton, fresh off the glory of the Avalanche project

But just as these inspiring leaders stood on the shoulders of those who came before, we are shored up by the accomplishments of our departing colleagues and challenged to reach even higher. As we start a new chapter, we are more resolved in our purpose and more committed to our standards.

Let us settle into this new world order. Then fire away with questions and criticisms.

Thanks to all of you for your patience.

Fondly,
Jill


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Biotech Firms, Billions at Risk, Lobby States to Limit Generics

In statehouses around the country, some of the nation's biggest biotechnology companies are lobbying intensively to limit generic competition to their blockbuster drugs, potentially cutting into the billions of dollars in savings on drug costs contemplated in the federal health care overhaul law.

Genentech, via Associated Press

The biological drug Avastin for cancer from Genentech.

The complex drugs, made in living cells instead of chemical factories, account for roughly one-quarter of the nation's $320 billion in spending on drugs, according to IMS Health. And that percentage is growing. They include some of the world's best-selling drugs, like the rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis drugs Humira and Enbrel and the cancer treatments Herceptin, Avastin and Rituxan. The drugs now cost patients — or their insurers — tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

Two companies, Amgen and Genentech, are proposing bills that would restrict the ability of pharmacists to substitute generic versions of biological drugs for brand name products.

Bills have been introduced in at least eight states since the new legislative sessions began this month. Others are pending.

The Virginia House of Delegates already passed one such bill last week, by a 91-to-6 vote.

The companies and other proponents say such measures are needed to protect patient safety because the generic versions of biological drugs are not identical to the originals. For that reason, they are usually called biosimilars rather than generics.

Generic drug companies and insurers are taking their own steps to oppose or amend the state bills, which they characterize as pre-emptive moves to deter the use of biosimilars, even before any get to market.

"All of these things are put in there for a chilling effect on these biosimilars," said Brynna M. Clark, director of state affairs for the Generic Pharmaceutical Association. The limits, she said, "don't sound too onerous but undermine confidence in these drugs and are burdensome."

Genentech, which is owned by Roche, makes Rituxan, Herceptin and Avastin, the best-selling cancer drugs in the world Amgen makes Enbrel, the anemia drugs Epogen and Aranesp, and the drugs Neupogen and Neulasta for protecting chemotherapy patients from infections. All have billions of dollars in annual sales and, with the possible exception of Enbrel, are expected to lose patent protection in the next several years.

The trench fighting at the state level is the latest phase in a battle over the rules for adding competition to the biotechnology drug market as called for in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010.

A related battle on the federal level is whether biosimilars will have the same generic name as the brand name product. If they did not, pharmacists could not substitute the biosimilar for the original, even if states allowed it.

Biosimilars are unlikely to be available in the United States for at least two more years, though they have been on the market in Europe for several years. And the regulatory uncertainty appears to be diminishing enthusiasm among some companies for developing such drugs.

"We're still dealing with chaos," said Craig A. Wheeler, the chief executive of Momenta Pharmaceuticals, which is developing biosimilars. "This is a pathway that neither industry nor the F.D.A. knows how to use."

Biotech drugs, known in the industry as biologics, are much more complex than pills like Lipitor or Prozac.

That makes it extremely difficult to tell if a copy of a biological drug is identical to the original. Even slight changes in the cells that make the proteins can change the drug's properties.

The 1984 law governing generics does not cover biologicals, which barely existed then. That is why it was addressed in the 2010 law.

One reason generic pills are so inexpensive is that state laws generally allow pharmacists to substitute a generic for a brand-name drug unless the doctor explicitly asks them not to. That means generic drug manufacturers need not spend money on sales and marketing.

The bills being proposed in state legislatures would expand state substitution laws to include biosimilars. So Amgen and Genentech say the bills support the development of biosimilars.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Congress Faces Deep-Seated Resistance to Immigration Plan

Doug Mills/The New York Times

Senator Marco Rubio, at lectern, and other members of a bipartisan group of lawmakers offered an immigration plan on Monday.

GREENVILLE, S.C. — At Tommy's Country Ham House, a popular spot downtown for politics and comfort food, not much has changed since 2007, the last time conservatives here made it crystal clear to politicians how they felt about what they see as amnesty for people who entered the country illegally.

"What we need to do is put them on a bus," said Ken Sowell, 63, a lawyer from Greenville, as he ate lunch recently at the diner. "We need to enforce the border. If they want to apply legally more power to them. I don't think just because a bunch of people violate the law, we ought to change the law for them."

Six years ago, the intensity of that kind of sentiment was enough to scuttle immigration overhaul efforts led by President George W. Bush and a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Senators John McCain of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, both Republicans.

Now, as a new bipartisan group of eight senators, including Mr. Graham and Mr. McCain, try again — this time with President Obama as their partner in the White House — members of Congress will have to overcome deep-seated resistance like that expressed in the restaurant if they are to push legislation forward.

Republicans are betting that opposition from Tea Party activists and the party's most conservative supporters will have less impact because of the dire electoral consequences of continuing to take a hard line regarding immigrants. The senators on Monday released a blueprint for a new immigration policy that opens the door to possible citizenship ahead of a Tuesday speech on the subject by Mr. Obama in Las Vegas.

There is some evidence that the politics of immigration may be changing. Sean Hannity, the conservative host at Fox News, said days after the 2012 presidential election that he has "evolved" on immigration and now supports a comprehensive approach that could "get rid of" the issue for Republicans. Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, a rising star in the Republican Party, is pushing his own version of broad immigration changes — and getting praise from conservative icons like Grover Norquist and Ralph Reed.

But the Republican-controlled House remains a big hurdle. Speaker John A. Boehner on Monday was noncommittal about the emerging proposal, with a spokesman saying that Mr. Boehner "welcomes the work of leaders like Senator Rubio on this issue, and is looking forward to learning more about the proposal."

Representative Lamar Smith, Republican of Texas and a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, said that "when you legalize those who are in the country illegally, it costs taxpayers millions of dollars, costs American workers thousands of jobs and encourages more illegal immigration."

And if the lunch rush conversation at Tommy's is any indication, many Republican lawmakers will soon return home to find their constituents just as opposed to the idea as they were before. Concern about immigration varies regionally. But in many Congressional districts around the country, the prospect of intense opposition carries with it the threat of a primary challenger if Republican lawmakers stray too far from hawkish orthodoxy on the issue.

"The people who are coming across the border — as far as I'm concerned, they are common criminals," said Bill Storey, 68, a retired civil engineer from Greenville. "We should not adopt policies to reward them for coming into this country illegally. I have all the regard for them in the world if they come through the legal system, but not the illegal system."

Charlie Newton, a construction worker in the Greenville area, praised the work ethic of Hispanic co-workers, but said he opposes any laws that would provide benefits to illegal immigrants, including help becoming citizens.

"I think we need to help our own people before we keep helping somebody else," he said.

The president's proposals are expected to include more border enforcement, work site verification systems that allow employers to check the status of their employees online, and a road map to citizenship for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants now living in the country. Democratic senators could begin work on a bill in the next couple of weeks.

In the Fourth Congressional District in South Carolina, which includes Greenville, the formal arrival of such a plan is likely to anger the constituents of Trey Gowdy, a Republican House member who was elected in the 2010 Tea Party wave and is now the chairman of a key subcommittee that will deal with immigration.

Mr. Gowdy has already taken a hard line, signing on last year to the "Prohibiting Backdoor Amnesty Act," which aimed to reverse Mr. Obama's plans to delay deportations for some young illegal immigrants. The congressman will be under pressure to change his mind from the White House and its allies, including groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. But when he goes home to Greenville, Mr. Gowdy may find that his constituents want him to hold firm in his opposition.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Brown Looks at Reshaping California’s Higher Education

Lennox McLendon/Associated Press

Jerry Brown, left, with his parents, former Gov. Edmund G. Brown of California and Bernice Brown, celebrates his reelection as governor of California in 1978.

LOS ANGELES — During a 1960s renaissance, California's public university system came to be seen as a model for the rest of the country and an economic engine for the state. Seven new campuses opened, statewide enrollment doubled, and state spending on higher education more than doubled. The man widely credited with the ascendance was Gov. Edmund G. Brown, known as Pat.

Decades of state budget cuts have chipped away at California's community colleges, California State University and the University of California, once the state's brightest beacons of pride. But now Pat Brown's son, Gov. Jerry Brown, seems determined to restore some of the luster to the institution that remains a key part of his father's legacy.

Last year, he told voters that a tax increase was the only way to avoid more years of drastic cuts. Now, with the tax increase approved and universities anticipating more money from the state for the first time in years, the second Governor Brown is a man eager to take an active role in shaping the University of California and California State University systems.

Governor Brown holds a position on the board of trustees for both Cal State and UC. Since November, he has attended every meeting of both boards, asking about everything from dormitories to private donations and federal student loans. He is twisting arms on issues he has long held dear, like slashing executive pay and increasing teaching requirements for professors — ideas that have long been met with considerable resistance from academia. But Mr. Brown, himself a graduate of University of California, Berkeley, has never been a man to shrink from a debate.

"The language we use when talking about the university must be honest and clear," he said in a recent interview. "Words like 'quality' have no apparent meaning that is obvious. These are internally defined to meet institutional needs rather than societal objectives."

California's public colleges — so central to the state's identity that their independence is enshrined in its Constitution — have long been seen as gateways to the middle class. Mr. Brown said his mother had attended the schools "basically free." Over the last five years tuition at UC and Cal State schools has shot up, though the colleges remain some of the less costly in the country.

Governors and legislatures are trying to exert more influence on state colleges, often trying to prod the schools to save money, matters that some say are "arguably best left to the academic institution," said John Aubrey Douglass, a senior research fellow of public policy and higher education at Berkeley. So far, Mr. Brown has not taken such an aggressive approach, but half of the $250 million increase for the university systems is contingent on a tuition freeze.

"He's creating stability, but basically he's looking at cost containment with an eye on the public constituency," Mr. Douglass said. "But the system has been through a very long period of disinvestment, and this may meet an immediate political need, but it is not what is going to help in the long term."

Over all, the University of California receives 44 percent less from the state than it did in 1990, accounting for inflation. The governor's proposed increase still leaves the schools with about $625 million less than they received in 2007. At the same time, a record number of students applied for admissions to the system's 10 campuses for next fall. While the California State University system has capped freshman enrollment, administrators at the UC system, which has about 190,000 undergraduate students, have been reluctant to formally do so, in part to prevent limiting access to in-state students.

Spurred by grumbling from voters, legislators have repeatedly complained that too many out-of-state students are enrolling in the University of California, arguing that they take spots away from talented local students. But others argue that without the out-of-state students, who make up less than 9 percent of undergraduates and pay much more in tuition, the university would have to make even deeper cuts.

Timothy White, the newly appointed chancellor for California State University and the former chancellor at UC Riverside, said the systems were facing a fundamental dilemma over access.

"Our budget is not going to allow us to grow enrollment at all, so I'm concerned that we are going to disappoint a lot of people in a lot of communities," he said.

So far, the governor has focused his attention on whether the universities should be offering more courses online, requiring faculty to teach more classes and cutting administrators' pay.

His plea that faculty members, particularly at the University of California, teach more undergraduate classes has been met with resistance, with one trustee fretting that doing so would "turn this place into a junior college in about 15 years." Faculty members say that requiring more teaching would take away from crucial research areas, which will bring in roughly $5 billion this year.

"You can talk abstractly about faculty teaching more, but that begs the question of what you give up by requiring them to teach more," said Daniel Dooley, the senior vice president for external relations for the University of California. Mr. Dooley, who worked in Mr. Brown's first administration in the 1970s, has had several conversations with the governor about the state colleges.

Even before he began attending the board of trustee meetings, Mr. Brown repeatedly criticized high salaries for university administrators, arguing that they should serve as "public servants" and be willing to accept smaller paychecks. During his last term he famously remarked that professors derived "psychic income" from their jobs. When the University of California board of trustees voted to approve the new chancellor at Berkeley, in November, Mr. Brown voted in favor of his appointment, but voted against his $486,000 salary.

Some see the governor's new focus as a sign that there could be major improvements afoot, but others are less optimistic.

"The old days of the social compact with the state is gone," Mr. Douglass said. "It seems clear that it will not come back."


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Deadly Rainstorms Ravage Eastern Australia

Dave Hunt/European Pressphoto Agency

The storm system has flooded Brisbane, above, in Queensland state to Sydney over 900 kilometers south and beyond.

SYDNEY, Australia — At least four people have died and thousands more have been displaced across Australia's east coast as punishing winds, torrential rains and powerful ocean swells inundated large swaths of the country's two most populous states.

The storm system, which has unleashed floods from north of Brisbane in Queensland state to Sydney over 900 kilometers south in New South Wales and beyond, is the result of a slow but very wet swing down the coast by the remains of Tropical Cyclone Oswald that began last week. The system has dumped record amounts of rain in many areas, isolating dozens of communities and snarling traffic both in the air and on land.

The floods continue a period of bizarre and destructive weather in Australia, which has been in the grips of a four-month heat wave that shattered records and ignited bush fires large enough to be seen from outer space.

But now, talk has turned from the punishing heat to the sheets of rain and wind that battered the coast up through the early hours of Tuesday. Winds approaching 100 kilometers per hour hit Sydney, where they churned up huge swells at its famed Bondi beach and drenched the city center. The storm has shattered rainfall records in parts of New South Wales, the Bureau of Meteorology said, although the highest rainfall was recorded about 780 kilometers north of Brisbane, where 1,360 millimeters fell in the three days through Sunday morning.

The city of Bundaberg, which is located about 470 kilometers north of Brisbane, has been particularly hit hard. More than 7,000 residents have been displaced by the rising floodwaters there and at least 1,000 evacuees had to be airlifted from their homes by military helicopter on Monday and Tuesday morning as the streets churned with water.

The floods come two years after flooding in 2011 left at least 38 people dead and caused some $30 billion of damage across the state.

Queensland's premier, Campbell Newman, on Tuesday visited the stricken city, where he warned that the floodwaters were threatening to carry away entire buildings.

"Listen to the roar of the water - that's not helicopters," he said during a televised press conference in the city. "You see a lot of locations where there's literally rapids, white water out there."

"Those velocities are what we're concerned about in terms of taking buildings away," he added.

The situation was little better in northern New South Wales, where the State Emergency Services estimated some 23,000 people had been isolated by the floodwaters. The state government ordered 2,100 people to evacuate from the regional hub of Grafton, near the border with Queensland, as that city suffered its worst-ever floods.

All four deaths connected with the storm have been in Queensland, where a three-year-old boy became the latest victim after he was hit by a falling tree in Brisbane on Monday. The others included a motorcyclist whose body was pulled from a creek south of Brisbane and an 81-year-old man whose body was found near Bundaberg.

Meanwhile, Virgin Australia, the country's second largest commercial airline after national carrier Qantas, announced on Tuesday that it was canceling dozens of flights across the region, including its services between Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne — the three largest cities in the country.

The worst of the winds and rain had passed by Tuesday morning, officials said, and Sydney's skies had turned blue by mid-afternoon, suggesting that any respite from the blistering heat in both states would be short lived.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Morsi Declares Emergency in 3 Egypt Cities as Unrest Spreads

Written By Unknown on Senin, 28 Januari 2013 | 13.07

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

The New Republic Aims to Broaden Its Audience

Log in to manage your products and services from The New York Times and the International Herald Tribune.

Don't have an account yet?
Create an account »

Subscribed through iTunes and need an NYTimes.com account?
Learn more »


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More

Fire Sweeps Through Brazil Nightclu; Hundreds Dead

RIO DE JANEIRO — A fire ignited by a flare from a band's pyrotechnics spectacle swept through a nightclub filled with hundreds of university students early on Sunday morning in Santa Maria, a city in southern Brazil, killing at least 233 people, officials said.

Health workers hauled bodies from the club, called Kiss, to hospitals in Santa Maria all through Sunday morning. Some of the survivors were taken to the nearby city of Porto Alegre to be treated for burns. Valdeci Oliveira, a local legislator, told reporters that he saw piles of bodies in the nightclub's bathrooms.

Col. Guido Pedroso de Melo, the commander of the city's Fire Department, said in televised remarks that security guards had blocked the exit, which intensified the panic as people in the club stampeded to the doors.

Survivors described a frenzied and violent rush for the main exit. Murilo de Toledo Tiecher, 26, a medical student at the University of Caxias do Sul who was at the club, said he and his friends had to push through a crush of people to get around a metal barrier that was preventing the crowd from spilling out into the street. He said some people became trapped after they rushed into the bathroom near the exit, thinking it was a way out. Once he was outside, he said, he tried to pull others to safety.

"If we saw a hand or a head, we'd start pulling the person out by the hair," he said in a telephone interview. "People were burned; some didn't even have clothes."

The disaster ranks among the deadliest of nightclub fires, comparable to the 2003 blaze in Rhode Island that killed 100 people, one in 2004 in Buenos Aires in which 194 were killed, and a fire at a club in China in 2000 in which 309 people died.

The disaster in Santa Maria, which is in the relatively prosperous state of Rio Grande do Sul, shocked the country. President Dilma Rousseff canceled appointments at a summit meeting in Chile to travel to Santa Maria, a city of about 260,000 residents that is known for its cluster of universities.

The circumstances surrounding the blaze, including the use of pyrotechnics and the reports of the blocked exit, are expected to raise questions about whether the club's owners had been negligent. While it was not clear why patrons were initially not allowed to escape, it is common across Brazil for nightclubs and bars to have customers pay their entire tab upon leaving, instead of on a per-drink basis.

More broadly, the blaze may focus attention on issues of accountability in Brazil and point to the relaxed enforcement of measures aimed at protecting citizens, even with the economy on solid footing.

The nation's civil service has grown significantly over the past decade, tax revenues are soaring and there is no shortage of laws and regulations governing the minutiae of companies large and small. Yet preventable disasters still commonly claim lives in Brazil, as illustrated by Rio de Janeiro's building collapses, manhole explosions and trolley mishaps.

"Bureaucracy and corruption also cause tragedies," said André Barcinski, a columnist for Folha de São Paulo, one of Brazil's largest newspapers.

Some of the survivors' criticisms pointed to a heated argument over who was responsible. "Only after a multitude pushed down the security guards did they see" what they had done, Mr. Tiecher, the medical student, said in comments posted on Facebook.

In an interview, he said that security guards had blocked the club door and initially prevented people from escaping because they thought a fight had broken out inside, and that customers would use the opportunity to leave without paying their bar tabs. Only after they realized that a fire was raging inside did the security guards let the crowd go, Mr. Tiecher said.

Witnesses said the fire started about 2 a.m. after a rock band, Gurizada Fandangueira, began performing for an audience made up mostly of students in the agronomy and veterinary medicine programs at a local university. Mr. Tiecher said the band's singer lighted a kind of flare and held it over his ahead, accidentally setting the ceiling on fire. Members of the band were seen trying to douse the flames.

At least one member of the five-person band, which is based in Santa Maria and had advertised its use of pyrotechnics, was said to have been killed. Many of the victims died of smoke inhalation, officials said.

"The smoke spread very quickly," Aline Santos Silva, 29, one of the survivors, said in comments to the Globo News television network. "Those who were closest to the stage where the band was playing had the most difficulty getting out."

Human rights officials focused Sunday on the grief in Santa Maria. "How many families are now searching for their young one?" asked Maria do Rosário Nunes, a cabinet minister who is Ms. Rousseff's top human rights official.

Brazilian television stations broadcast images of trucks carrying corpses to hospitals where family members were gathering. Photographs taken shortly after the blaze and posted on the Web sites of local news organizations showed frantic scenes in which people on the street outside the nightclub pulled bodies from the charred debris.

Parents and other family members wandered through Santa Maria on Sunday searching for their loved ones. "I still think she hasn't died," Cibela Focco, 35, whose daughter was in the nightclub and still had not been heard from, told reporters Sunday evening.

The tragedy took place in a region of Brazil where Ms. Rousseff spent much of her early political career before rising to national prominence as a top aide to the former president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and running for president herself. Before leaving the meeting in Chile, she appeared distraught, crying in front of reporters as she absorbed details of the blaze.

"This is a tragedy," she said, "for all of us."

Jill Langlois contributed reporting from São Paulo, Brazil, and Michael Schwirtz from New York.

This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:

Correction: January 27, 2013

A picture of a hallway strewn with shoes that accompanied a previous version of this online article was used in error. It showed the aftermath of a fire in Buenos Aires in 2004, not Saturday night's fire in Santa Maria, Brazil.

Also, a credit from Agence France-Presse for two photographs that appeared with earlier versions of this story misidentified the photographer. The photographs were taken by Ronald Mendes, not by Lauro Alves.


13.07 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger